The numbers behind the greenwash at Lincoln Financial Field

No commentary, just numbers.

In advance, here's my results:

capacity capacity factor average output % of total
Natural gas/"bio"diesel 7.6 MW 77% 5.84 MW 98.5%
Solar panels 0.5 MW 14.5% 0.073 MW 1.2%
Vertical wind turbines 0.36 MW 5% 0.018 MW 0.3%

[Philadelphia Inquirer] Eagles aim to turn Lincoln Financial Field into world's greenest stadium

In the parking lot - not where the fans park - the Eagles will build a cogeneration power plant that can run on biodiesel or natural gas.

The capacity of the plant will be 7.6 megawatts; the solar and wind together will add only .86 of a megawatt.

In short, natural gas.

[Philadelphia Eagles] Lincoln Financial Field Will Be Powered With On-Site, Renewable Energy By September 2011

The Eagles have contracted with Orlando FL-based SolarBlue, a renewable energy and energy conservation company, to install approximately 80 20-foot spiral-shaped wind turbines on the top rim of the stadium...

No source explicitly names these turbines, but I fairly sure they are these ones (S594 -- the 19.8-foot model):

http://www.helixwind.com/en/product.php

http://www.helixwind.com/en/S594.php

Under this assumption, 80*4.5 kW = 360 kW of wind turbines, so the remainder (860 kW - 360 kW = 500 kW) is the solar panels.

How much wind power? The most optimistic number is the manufacturer's advertised figure: 3,362 kWh/year per turbine. Out of 4.5 kW nameplate capacity, this is a pitiable 8.5% capacity factor -- but that's the optimistic figure. In the footnote it mentions the assumed conditions: 7 m/s annual average wind speed (15.7 mph). Wildly optimistic.

The Philadelphia Inquirer article reported the average sustained winds as 8 - 10.9 mph, or 3.6 - 4.9 m/s (I think these numbers are at weather station elevation, 10 meters (33 feet)):

National Weather Service statistics show that monthly average wind speeds at nearby Philadelphia International Airport ranged from 8 miles an hour in August to 10.9 miles an hour in March.

Likewise, NREL statistics put Philadelphia in the worst wind category, 0 - 5.6 m/s (0 - 12.5 mph) annual average at 50 meters (164 feet) above ground level.

NREL | Wind Maps

Compare with the manufacturers' power curves:

Even at the upper limit of Philly 50-meter winds (5.6 m/s average), the range of expected output is from only 2,000 kWh/year down to roughly zero. The highest figure corresponds to 5% capacity factor, though, seeing the ranges involved, this is still wildly optimistic.

2,000 kWh/year per turbine * 80 turbines = 160,000 kWh/year = 18 kW average. Hilariously, this costs $1.28 million at retail price.

On to solar. NREL maps say this place gets roughly 4.5 kWh/year/m^2 for optimally-oriented flat plate (i.e. not sun-following) solar panels. (This is under "PV Solar Radiation (Flat Plate, Facing South, Latitude Tilt)—Static Maps" > "Annual")

NREL | Solar Maps

Note that solar nameplate capacities are measured at 1 kW/m^2 irradiance (standard test conditions), so that assuming linear power/irradiance (very reasonable) 4.5 kWh/day/m^2 represents a capacity factor of 18.8%. Or close; this is the module's best-case DC output -- as NREL details, AC output would be around 0.77 of this (the "performance ratio"). So the capacity factor is around 14.5%.

(As a sanity check, the E.C. has a more sophisticated European map which does exactly the same calculation -- they assume a performance ratio of 0.75)

So in all: 14% * 500 kW = 614 kWh/year = 70 kW average output.

The surprisingly high capacity factor of the gas generator (why?) comes from this figure:

The Eagles and SolarBlue estimate that over the 20-year horizon, the on-site energy sources at Lincoln Financial Field will provide 1.039 billion kilowatt hours of electricity

[Philadelphia Eagles] Lincoln Financial Field Will Be Powered With On-Site, Renewable Energy By September 2011

Subtracting off the solar+wind generation, this leaves 1.024 billion kWh (basically all of it) to the 7.6 MW gas generator -- 77% capacity factor.

NREL | Wind Maps

NREL | Solar Maps

1 comment:

  1. Superb work as usual, uvdiv. So the question is, what proportion of the cogen plant fuel will be biodiesel? I read elsewhere that the 'renewable' part of this is supposed to produce "an impressive 4 MW", which will be supplied the grid to save the plant even more money. That implies two things: one, the sun will never set and the wind will never cease, and two, the cogen plant will be running on biodiesel 40-50% of the time.

    I really hope they publish their statistics to show the world how great their initiative is. Those types of data are so fun to look at. Like Bonneville Power Admin's real-time wind data, and Germany's solar output (that one is hilarious right now since it's winter).

    http://www.sma.de/en/news-information/pv-electricity-produced-in-germany.html

    It's fun to watch it inch up to 10% capacity factor at noon.

    ReplyDelete