Newsbox

Belgian Waffle

In case you missed the update in my earlier post, I've discovered some profoundly ignorant anti-nuke garbage in an extraordinary place - the official policy document of a German federal ministry:

[Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety] The myths of the nuclear industry

In retrospect, it explains a lot.

I pointed last week to Germany's horrible nuclear policy, wherein the new coalition is robbing nuclear operators to pay for wind mills. There are parallel developments in Belgium (which is 54% nuclear); they too have a mandatory phase-out, which they have decided to delay in exchange for, well, "protection money". The nuclear operator has been singled out for €1.1 billion in special, extra taxes, and will also be required to pay €500 million to renewable generators.

[Deutsche Welle] Belgium backtracks on nuclear phaseout

In his statement, Magnette said the deal meant Electrabel -- the Belgian arm of French utiltiy GDF Suez -- which is the main nuclear producer in the country, would pay the government between 215 and 245 million euros annually until 2014.

The exact sum, he said, would depend on production costs and market prices.

The energy ministry said that Electrabel would also be expected to invest 500 million Euros in renewables and to make a commitment to generate 10,000 new jobs before 2015.

[Reuters] Belgium demands GDF Suez settlement by Thurs-paper

BRUSSELS, Oct 17 (Reuters) - Belgium has demanded French utility GDF Suez (GSZ.PA) agree to a deal by Thursday on an energy charge of up to 500 million euros ($746 million), Belgian daily Le Soir wrote on Saturday.

GDF Suez Chief Executive Gerard Mestrallet was reported as saying on Thursday that he was not willing to pay the levy Belgium wants for 2009 -- 250 million euros for operating nuclear power stations, the same to a renewable energy fund.

In the US, the fine military tradition of $100 screwdrivers continues in Ft. Irwin's latest $2 billion "investment":

[Defense Industry Daily] Baking in the Mojave Sun: US Army Awards $2B Fort Irwin Solar Farm Project

The new 500 MW solar facilities are expected to produce approximately 1,000 Gigawatt hours (GWh) annually, far exceeding Fort Irwin’s 35 MW peak load.

So $2 billion for an average generation of 115 MWe. Basically the same price as a nuclear reactor, for 1/10th the output.

There is incredible news from India. Prime Minister Manhoman Singh announced a plan to basically convert the entire country to thorium-nuclear power in 40 years. 470 GW by 2050 (compared to its present annual generation of 80 GW).

[Guardian] India plans to cut carbon and fuel poverty with untested nuclear power | Prime minister Manmohan Singh announces 100-fold increase in nuclear energy output by 2050 with thorium technology

India has an ambitious three-stage nuclear programme which it sees as a "silver bullet" to its dire energy shortage. At present 400m people cannot light their homes and the country imports 70% of its oil.

Delhi says that it will be able to surmount these considerable problems and generate clean green power with an atomic programme that "virtuously recycles" the plutonium waste that reactors produce. This radioactive isotope takes thousands of years to be rendered safe and dealing with it is the greatest challenge facing nuclear energy's proponents.

Here is the text of the PM's speech:

PM’s inaugural address at the international conference on peaceful uses of Nuclear Energy

Here are a couple of descriptions of the Three Stage program (basically, bootstrapping the thorium economy with PHWRs and LMFBRs):

[NEI Magazine] India’s plans for thorium, according to K. Anantharaman of India’s Bhabha Atomic Research Centre

[PDF] [Indian Department of Atomic Energy] Shaping the Third Stage of the Indian Nuclear Power Programme

The basic fuel cycle, from the second link:

Credit Indian Department of Atomic Energy

Besides the advanced breeder reactors and reprocessing systems, there are other very interesting futuristic technologies in this plan. It mentions ADS - accelerator-driven systems, that is, subcritical fission cores "driven" by an external neutron source, which is a spallation accelerator. (fusion/fission hybrids are a similar concept.) The accelerator neutrons are extremely energetic (fast/hard) by reactor standards - above 1 MeV - which is very useful for transmuting certain isotopes in spent fuel (both higher actinides, and even some fission products). Hence the arrow from "disposal/incineration".

Pu-238 RTG on New Horizons probe

(Pluto/Kuiper belt)

And they also indicate research in laser isotopic separation - things like AVLIS, in which (as I understand) narrowband lasers selectively ionize atoms of one isotope but not another. (This actually exploits nuclear properties directly (not mass differences), because the transitions involved are "hyperfine" - they involve the interaction of electrons with the nuclear magnetic moment. And different isotopes have different nuclear structure, hence different hyperfine splittings. Very cool stuff.) Here it is an unconventional isotopic separation - separating the radioactive contaminant U-232 from the fissile U-233, in the thorium fuel cycle.

Yet another "really cool thing" in the fuel cycle is the Np-237 separation - this is a step for creating very pure Pu-238 (Np-237 (n,y) Np-238 (,e-) Pu-238). Pu-238 is an alpha-only emitter whose primary use is for radioisotope heat sources for deep-space travel.

The US, for contrast, is already perfectly capable of creating Pu-238 for spacecraft (in Idaho) but currently has a severe shortage because of Congressional politics:

[NPR] Plutonium Shortage Could Stall Space Exploration

RTG alone

In closely related news, the Indian AHWR design is being prepped for the international market as well:

[World Nuclear News] Thorium-fueled exports coming from India

There is also a huge announcement in China: two new sodium fast reactors, the Russian BN-800 design, are slated for construction:

[World Nuclear News] China signs up Russian fast reactors

Looks like the closed fuel cycle economy is just around the corner.

3 comments:

  1. Are the Indians in the lead on closed fuel cycles?

    I attended a talk a couple of years ago by a (retired?) British fusion physicist, proposing a nuclear fuel economy with a diverse mix of reactors each serving different roles in the processing of fuel, and with variations suited for different applications (process heat, large or small scale generation, proliferation resistance, waste burn up). He also suggested that energy negative fusion tokamaks could pay their keep in such an economy as an abundant source of fast neutrons for processing waste and fuel for other parts of the economy. The Indian plan briefly mentions 14 MeV neutrons...

    It seems to me that the more diverse technologies you have, the better equipped you will be to deal with problems thrown up by any one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What became of the post that Google indexed recently?

    The Capacity Factor: "Thorium" scam widely linked, hits Slashdot
    uvdiv.blogspot.com/2011/08/thorium-scam-widely-linked-hits.html
    The key to the system developed by inventor Charles Stevens, CEO and chairman of Connecticut-based Laser Power Systems, is that when silvery metal thorium ...

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Anonymous --

    I thought it was a weak post on my part and removed it.

    ReplyDelete